Nivison, David S., “Communist ethics and Chinese tradition”, Journal of Asian Studies,
16:1 (1956), pp. 51‒74.Noumoff, S.J., “Mao as philosopher”, in Gibson, J.M. and Johnston, D.M. (eds.), Canadian Essays on Revolutionary China
(Toronto: Canadian Institute of International Affairs, 1971), pp. 55‒64.Parsons, Howard L., “Remarks on Charles Wei-Hsun Fu, ‘Confucianism, Marxism-Leninism and Mao: A Critical Study’”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy,
2 (Summer 1975), pp. 429‒445.Ram, Asha, “Mao Tse-tung: theoretical framework of his thoughts”, Indian Philosophical Quarterly,
4 (January 1977), pp. 215‒231.Ram, Asha, “Practical aspects of the thoughts of Mao Tse-tung”, Indian Philosophical Quarterly,
7 (January 1980), pp. 289‒300.Riepe, Dale (ed.), “Maoism: a twentieth-century Chinese philosophy”, in Asian Philosophy Today
(New York: Gordon and Breach, 1981).Schram, Stuart R., “Mao Tse-tung as Marxist dialectician”, China Quarterly,
29 (January-March 1967), pp. 155‒165.Schwartz, B.I., “The philosopher”, in Wilson, Dick (ed.), Mao Tse-tung in the Scales of History
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), pp. 9‒34.Singh, Bhola Prasad, “The philosophical foundations of Mao’s peasant communism”, Indian Journal of Political Studies,
1:1 (January 1977), pp. 59‒70.Soo, Francis, Mao Tse-tung’s Theory of Dialectic
(Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1981).Wakeman, Jr., Frederic, History and Will: Philosophical Perspectives of Mao Tse-tung’s Thought
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).Whitehead, Raymond L., Love and Struggle in Mao’s Thought
(New York: Orbis Books, 1977).Wittfogel, Karl and Chao, C.R., “Some remarks on Mao’s handling of concepts and problems of dialectics”, Studies in Soviet Thought,
3:4 (1963), pp. 125‒160.Wu, J.S., “Understanding Maoism: a Chinese philosopher’s critique”, Studies in Soviet Thought,
15:2 (June 1975), pp. 1‒118.<p><emphasis>Ideology</emphasis></p>
Amin, Samir, The Future of Maoism,
translated by Norman Finkelstein (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983).Andors, Stephen, “Mao and Marx: a comment”, Modern China,
3:4 (October 1977), pp. 427‒433.Blumier, Jay,“On the correct handling of contradictions within Mao Tse-tung”, Socialist Commentary
(July 1957), pp. 5‒7.Chang Chi-yun, “Antitheses between San-Min-Chu-Yi and Maoist communism”, Chinese Culture,
20:3 (September 1979), pp. 1‒25.Chang, Maria Hsia and Gregor, James A., “Maoism and Marxism in comparative perspective”, Review of Politics,
40:3 (July 1978), pp. 307‒327.Chen Yung Ping, Chinese Political Thought: Mao Tse Tung and Liu Shao-Chi
(The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966).Ch’en, Jerome, Mao
(New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969).Ch’en, Jerome (ed.), Mao Papers: Anthology and Bibliography
(London: Oxford University Press, 1970).Ch’en, Jerome, “The development and logic of Mao Tse-tung’s thought, 1928‒49”, in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Ideology and Politics in Contemporary China
(Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1973), pp. 78‒114.Chiao Chien, “New wine in old bottles: Some characteristics of the study of Mao Tse-tung’s thought movement in the sixties”, Journal of the Chinese University of Hong Kong,
3:1 (1975), pp. 207‒216.Chin, Steve S.K., “Identity and contradiction: An explanation of the Mao-Liu struggle from an ideological point of view”, Studies in Soviet Thought,
10:3 (September 1970), pp. 227‒254.Chin Ssu-Kai, “The essence of the development of Marxism-Leninism by Mao Tse-tung”, Asian Thought and Society,
2:1 (1977), pp. 124‒134.Chou Tzu-ch’iang, “Elements of Chinese culture in Mao Tse-tung’s works”, Issues and Studies,
9:6 (1973), pp. 35‒56.Christensen, Peter Moller and Delman, Jorgen, “A theory of transitional society: Mao Zedong and the Shanghai School”, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars,
13:2 (April-June 1981), pp. 2‒15.Cohen, Arthur A., “How original is ‘Maoism’?”, Problems of Communism,
X:6 (November-December 1961), pp. 34‒42.Cohen, Arthur A., The Communism of Mao Tse-tung
(Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1964).Cohen, Arthur A., “Maoism”, in Drachkovitch, M.M. (ed.), Marxism in the Modern World
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965).